Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHensher, David A.
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-23
dc.date.available2018-11-23
dc.date.issued2006-08-01
dc.identifier.issn1832-570X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/19419
dc.description.abstractThis paper documents some thoughts on the reform agenda in public transit that is occurring throughout the world. The specific focus is on a growing commitment to competitive regulation through competitive tendering, and the efforts by a few governments (notably in Australia) to take control of the tangible assets used by private operators as a mechanism to exercise the opportunity, if so taken, to put services out to competitive tender. We review the theoretical arguments and the empirical evidence on contracting regimes and asset ownership, and the role that government and operator might play in a setting in which building trusting and collaborative partnerships has merit in delivering services that are in the main funded from the public purse.en_AU
dc.relation.ispartofseriesITLS-WP-06-19en_AU
dc.subjectPublic transit, competition, tendering, asset ownership, efficiency, trusting partnerships, incomplete contracts, contractible quality, non-contractible qualityen_AU
dc.titleDelivering Value for Money to Government through Efficient and Effective Public Transit Service Continuity: Some Thoughtsen_AU
dc.typeWorking Paperen_AU
dc.contributor.departmentITLSen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.