Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHensher, David A.
dc.contributor.authorRose, John M.
dc.contributor.authorCollins, Andrew T.
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-22
dc.date.available2018-11-22
dc.date.issued2012-10-01
dc.identifier.issn1832-570X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/19309
dc.description.abstractThis paper investigates support for road pricing reform within the framework of a referendum voting choice model. Central to this task is how to identify ex ante support for specific road pricing schemes, such that the evidence is believable. Our approach is centred on a referendum voting choice model for alternative road pricing schemes in which we incorporate information that accounts for the degree of belief of the extent to which such schemes will make voters better or worse off. We find that accounting for belief in the benefits results in sizeable reductions in the sensitivity to the levels of the charge but quite small impacts on the sensitivity to revenue allocation.en
dc.relation.ispartofseriesITLS-WPen
dc.rightsOtheren
dc.subjectRoad pricing reform, voting choice, referendum, subjective belief, perceptual conditioning, revenue allocation, elasticities, choice experimenten
dc.titleUnderstanding buy in for risky prospects: Incorporating degree of belief into the ex ante assessment of support for alternative road pricing schemesen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
usyd.facultyThe University of Sydney Business School, Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies (ITLS)en
usyd.citation.volume12-19en


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.