Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHo, Chinh
dc.contributor.authorHensher, David
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-21
dc.date.available2018-11-21
dc.date.issued2014-04-01
dc.identifier.issnISSN 1832-570X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/19190
dc.description.abstractThe application of a strategic transport – land use model usually requires dwelling price data for both the chosen and non-chosen alternatives. Previous studies have used average dwelling prices either externally sourced from Census and commercial data or internally generated by hedonic models. The use of average prices may be reasonable if the spatial resolution is fine enough to ensure the absence of price endogeneity– a well known issue but hardly investigated in the literature on housing choices. Using data collected from a revealed preference survey conducted in Sydney in 2013, this paper presents a hedonic price model to obtain price data for each dwelling as a function of dwelling and location characteristics. The data are then used as input into a tenure and dwelling type choice model and a test undertaken to investigate the possible presence of price endogeneity, which we show to not exist. Price elasticities of demand for different dwelling types are derived and the application of this model within a broader and very general framework of the new version of the ‘Transportation and Environment Strategy Impact Simulator’ (New-TRESIS) is discussed.en_AU
dc.relation.ispartofseriesITLS‐WP‐14‐07en_AU
dc.subjectDwelling prices, hedonic price, choice models, endogenity, integrated transport and land use modelsen_AU
dc.titleHousing prices and price endogeneity in tenure and dwelling type choice modelsen_AU
dc.typeWorking Paperen_AU
dc.contributor.departmentITLSen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.