Post-digital aesthetics and the function of process.
Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Andrews, Ian | en_AU |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-11-22 | |
dc.date.available | 2013-11-22 | |
dc.date.issued | 2013-01-01 | en_AU |
dc.identifier.citation | Cleland, K., Fisher, L. & Harley, R. (2013) Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Electronic Art, ISEA2013, Sydney. | en_AU |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2123/9688 | |
dc.description.abstract | The theorisation of post-digital aesthetics in music and sound art seems to be split in two contradictory directions. One direction emphasises the foregrounding of digital processes through the use of process-based procedures, while the other tends toward a neo-modernist, sound-in-itself tendency that would seek to obscure the role of process in the work. This paper argues for a re-evaluation of post-digital music and sound art practices from the perspective of non-subjective modes of composition and making, where aesthetic intentions are suspended. | en_AU |
dc.publisher | ISEA International | en_AU |
dc.publisher | Australian Network for Art & Technology | en_AU |
dc.publisher | University of Sydney | en_AU |
dc.subject | Post-Digital | en_AU |
dc.subject | Aesthetics | en_AU |
dc.subject | Audio, Neo-Modernism | en_AU |
dc.subject | Sound-in-Itself | en_AU |
dc.subject | Music | en_AU |
dc.subject | Non-Intention | en_AU |
dc.subject | Glitch | en_AU |
dc.title | Post-digital aesthetics and the function of process. | en_AU |
dc.type | Conference paper | en_AU |
Associated file/s
Associated collections