Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLevin, Joshua
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-09
dc.date.available2011-12-09
dc.date.issued2011-01-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/7988
dc.description.abstractDuring the American Civil War the Federals and Confederates believed that Britain was likely to intervene. This belief is pervasive in current historiography, which argues that Britain was constantly on the threshold of interfering in the American conflict. Taking a longer view of the Anglo-American diplomatic relationship, as well as the relevance of contextual British economic, social, political and foreign policy interests and limitations, this thesis argues that Britain was never going to abandon neutrality. Drawing on the personal papers and official correspondence of diplomats and politicians, it becomes clear that occasionally aggressive transatlantic rhetoric was a negotiating strategy for two nations concerned with maintaining peace at all costs.en_AU
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.rightsThe author retains copyright of this thesisen
dc.subjectAmerican Civil Waren_AU
dc.subjectdiplomatic historyen_AU
dc.subjectBritish foreign policyen_AU
dc.subjectBritish public opinionen_AU
dc.subjectninteenth centuryen_AU
dc.subject1861-1865en_AU
dc.titleMuch Ado About Nothing: British Non-Intervention During The American Civil Waren_AU
dc.typeThesis, Honoursen_AU
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Historyen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.