Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLevin, Joshua
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-09
dc.date.available2011-12-09
dc.date.issued2011-01-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/7988
dc.description.abstractDuring the American Civil War the Federals and Confederates believed that Britain was likely to intervene. This belief is pervasive in current historiography, which argues that Britain was constantly on the threshold of interfering in the American conflict. Taking a longer view of the Anglo-American diplomatic relationship, as well as the relevance of contextual British economic, social, political and foreign policy interests and limitations, this thesis argues that Britain was never going to abandon neutrality. Drawing on the personal papers and official correspondence of diplomats and politicians, it becomes clear that occasionally aggressive transatlantic rhetoric was a negotiating strategy for two nations concerned with maintaining peace at all costs.en
dc.language.isoen_AUen
dc.rightsOtheren
dc.subjectAmerican Civil Waren
dc.subjectdiplomatic historyen
dc.subjectBritish foreign policyen
dc.subjectBritish public opinionen
dc.subjectninteenth centuryen
dc.subject1861-1865en
dc.titleMuch Ado About Nothing: British Non-Intervention During The American Civil Waren
dc.typeThesisen
dc.type.thesisHonoursen
dc.rights.otherThe author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.en
usyd.facultyFaculty of Arts and Social Sciences, School of Humanities
usyd.departmentDepartment of Historyen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.