Accuracy of methods to estimate central aortic systolic blood pressure via upper-arm cuff: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Objectives. Central aortic BP may predict cardiovascular outcomes better than upper-arm brachial BP. In recent years technology has enabled central BP estimation by recording a peripheral BP waveform from a standard upper-arm cuff. The accuracy of these devices is not well documented, and this study aimed to address this issue. Methods. This study was a systematic review, conducted according to PRISMA guidelines, of observational studies published between 2008-2023 that reported accuracy testing of cuff-based central BP devices, compared to reference invasive aortic BP. The primary analysis was stratified according to each commercially available device. Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models based on mean differences and standard errors. Results. 6,415 studies were screened, and 27 studies met inclusion criteria (plus one unpublished study). This generated data for seven devices that are commercially available, which were tested among 2,125 adult participants. There was very high heterogeneity when all devices were pooled (I2=97.5%), and, when stratified by device, the accuracy of estimated central BP was highly device dependent (range of accuracy across different devices -12.4 mmHg (-16.3 to -8.5) to 3.2 mmHg (0.2 to 6.1)). Two of the seven commercially available devices had not undergone external validation testing. Conclusions. The accuracy of commercially available cuff-based central BP devices is highly device-specific and not all are accurate for the estimation of central SBP. These findings have major implications for the appropriate interpretation of studies that use cuff-based estimated central BP.