Public Diplomacy, Propaganda, or What? China's Communication Practices in the South China Sea Dispute on Twitter
Access status:
Open Access
Type
ArticleAbstract
Multiple modes of communication on social media can contribute to public diplomacy in informing,
conversing, and networking with members of foreign publics. However, manipulative behaviours on
social media, prevalent especially in high tension contexts, create disruptions to ...
See moreMultiple modes of communication on social media can contribute to public diplomacy in informing, conversing, and networking with members of foreign publics. However, manipulative behaviours on social media, prevalent especially in high tension contexts, create disruptions to authentic communication in what could be grey/black propaganda or information warfare. This study reviews existing literature about models of public diplomacy to guide an empirical study of China’s communication in the #SouthChinaSea conversation on Twitter. It uses computational methods to identify, record, and analyze one-way, two-way, and network communication of China’s actors. It employs manual qualitative research to determine the nature of China’s actors. On that basis, it assesses China’s Twitter communication in the issue against various models of public diplomacy.
See less
See moreMultiple modes of communication on social media can contribute to public diplomacy in informing, conversing, and networking with members of foreign publics. However, manipulative behaviours on social media, prevalent especially in high tension contexts, create disruptions to authentic communication in what could be grey/black propaganda or information warfare. This study reviews existing literature about models of public diplomacy to guide an empirical study of China’s communication in the #SouthChinaSea conversation on Twitter. It uses computational methods to identify, record, and analyze one-way, two-way, and network communication of China’s actors. It employs manual qualitative research to determine the nature of China’s actors. On that basis, it assesses China’s Twitter communication in the issue against various models of public diplomacy.
See less
Date
2022Source title
Journal of Public DiplomacyVolume
2Issue
1Publisher
Korean Association for Public Diplomacy (KAPD)Licence
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0Faculty/School
Faculty of Arts and Social SciencesDepartment, Discipline or Centre
Media and Communications; Chinese StudiesShare