Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKahneman, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorLovallo, Dan
dc.contributor.authorSibony, Olivier
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-04T07:02:44Z
dc.date.available2022-05-04T07:02:44Z
dc.date.issued2019en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/a-structured-approach-to-strategic-decisions/
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/28501
dc.description.abstractSome management decisions are made without weighing quite so much information. But strategic decisions tend to involve the distillation of complexity into a single path forward. Given how unreliable human judgment is, all evaluations are susceptible to errors. These errors can stem from known cognitive biases - or they can be random errors, sometimes called "noise". Unreliability in judgment has long been recognized and studied, particularly in the context of decision-making about hiring. Here, Kahneman et al. describe the Mediating Assessments Protocol, a practical, broadly applicable approach to reducing errors in strategic decision-making.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherMIT Sloan School of Managementen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofMIT Sloan Management Reviewen_AU
dc.subjectleadershipen_AU
dc.subjectstrategyen_AU
dc.subjectleadership skillsen_AU
dc.subjectdeveloping strategyen_AU
dc.subjectexecuting strategyen_AU
dc.titleA Structured Approach to Strategic Decisionsen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.relation.arcDP160102290
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::The University of Sydney Business School::Discipline of Strategy, Innovation and Entrepreneurshipen_AU
usyd.citation.volume60en_AU
usyd.citation.issue3en_AU
usyd.citation.spage67en_AU
usyd.citation.epage73en_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyYesen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.