Generative sensing in design evaluation
Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Dong, Andy | |
dc.contributor.author | Garbuio, Massimo | |
dc.contributor.author | Lovallo, Dan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-05-04T06:42:50Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-05-04T06:42:50Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | en_AU |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2123/28494 | |
dc.description.abstract | The analysis of design review conversations from a junior-level undergraduate industrial design course and an entrepreneurship course uncovered a new pattern of design thinking. Design thinking during concept evaluation contains a recursive hypothesis-driven pattern that we name generative sensing. Generative sensing commences with deductive reasoning from established rules to a definitive conclusion in favour of or against a concept. These conclusions become the basis for new hypotheses that suggest actions to address problems or invite rebuttals to defend the original logic of the concept. Generative sensing is a pattern of design thinking that creates ways through the design problem by testing propositions in a recursive manner. | en_AU |
dc.language.iso | en | en_AU |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Ltd | en_AU |
dc.relation.ispartof | Design Studies | en_AU |
dc.rights | Other | en_AU |
dc.subject | Decision making | en_AU |
dc.subject | Design thinking | en_AU |
dc.subject | Abduction | en_AU |
dc.title | Generative sensing in design evaluation | en_AU |
dc.type | Article | en_AU |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.destud.2016.01.003 | |
dc.relation.arc | DP160102290 | |
usyd.faculty | SeS faculties schools::The University of Sydney Business School::Discipline of Strategy, Innovation and Entrepreneurship | en_AU |
usyd.citation.volume | 45 | en_AU |
usyd.citation.spage | 68 | en_AU |
usyd.citation.epage | 91 | en_AU |
workflow.metadata.only | Yes | en_AU |
Associated file/s
Associated collections