Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDong, Andy
dc.contributor.authorGarbuio, Massimo
dc.contributor.authorLovallo, Dan
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-04T06:42:50Z
dc.date.available2022-05-04T06:42:50Z
dc.date.issued2016en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/28494
dc.description.abstractThe analysis of design review conversations from a junior-level undergraduate industrial design course and an entrepreneurship course uncovered a new pattern of design thinking. Design thinking during concept evaluation contains a recursive hypothesis-driven pattern that we name generative sensing. Generative sensing commences with deductive reasoning from established rules to a definitive conclusion in favour of or against a concept. These conclusions become the basis for new hypotheses that suggest actions to address problems or invite rebuttals to defend the original logic of the concept. Generative sensing is a pattern of design thinking that creates ways through the design problem by testing propositions in a recursive manner.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_AU
dc.relation.ispartofDesign Studiesen_AU
dc.rightsOtheren_AU
dc.subjectDecision makingen_AU
dc.subjectDesign thinkingen_AU
dc.subjectAbductionen_AU
dc.titleGenerative sensing in design evaluationen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.destud.2016.01.003
dc.relation.arcDP160102290
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::The University of Sydney Business School::Discipline of Strategy, Innovation and Entrepreneurshipen_AU
usyd.citation.volume45en_AU
usyd.citation.spage68en_AU
usyd.citation.epage91en_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyYesen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.