Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEisenbart, Boris
dc.contributor.authorGarbuio, Massimo
dc.contributor.authorMascia, Daniele
dc.contributor.authorMorandi, Federica
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-04T06:28:39Z
dc.date.available2022-05-04T06:28:39Z
dc.date.issued2016en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/28488
dc.description.abstractPurpose Managers spend a great deal of time in meetings making decisions critical to organisational success, yet the design aspects of meetings remain largely understudied. The purpose of this paper is to elaborate on the potential impact of one critical design aspect of meetings – namely, whether a decision to be taken (or the meeting in general) was scheduled or not – on the use of distributed information, information elaboration, conflict, speed of decision making, and, ultimately, decision-making effectiveness. Design/methodology/approach The research presented in this paper combines a literature review with empirical data obtained from questionnaires and direct observation of decision making meetings on organisational issues in a hospital. One meeting was scheduled, the other two were unscheduled. A second questionnaire was administered 12 months after the respective decision making meetings to explore and evaluate the efficiency of the decisions made and their implementation. Findings This paper suggests that a scheduled meeting with a shared agenda of all decisions to be taken may induce decision makers to form opinions upfront at the meeting, with these opinions eventually serving as sources of conflict during group discussion. Because of the nature of the conflict generated, these meetings are more likely to run long and to not deliver the expected outcomes. Originality/value The study contributes to the debate on group decision-making processes by examining the effect of meeting scheduling on information elaboration and conflict in real-world decision-making settings. Although robust evidence has supported the existence of relationships between information elaboration, conflict, and decision-making effectiveness, previous studies have mainly focused on the effects of these processes during scheduled meetings and experimental settings. The findings of the present study show the effect of meeting scheduling on decision-making effectiveness in real-world settings.en
dc.publisherEmerald Group Publishing Ltd.en
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Strategy and Managementen
dc.rightsOtheren
dc.subjectConflicten
dc.subjectMeetingsen
dc.subjectDecision processen
dc.subjectGroup decision makingen
dc.subjectInformation elaborationen
dc.titleDoes scheduling matter? When unscheduled decision making results in more effective meetingsen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/JSMA-03-2014-0017
dc.relation.arcDP160102290
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::The University of Sydney Business School::Discipline of International Businessen
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::The University of Sydney Business School::Discipline of Strategy, Innovation and Entrepreneurshipen
usyd.citation.volume9en
usyd.citation.issue1en
usyd.citation.spage15en
usyd.citation.epage38en
workflow.metadata.onlyYesen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.