Relating in vitro neutralisation level and protection in the CVnCoV (CUREVAC) trial
| Field | Value | Language |
| dc.contributor.author | Cromer, Deborah | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Reynaldi, Arnold | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Steain, Megan | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Triccas, James A | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Davenport, Miles P | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Khoury, David S | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-26T05:05:11Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-11-26T05:05:11Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2123/27047 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Abstract A recent study analysed the relationship between neutralising antibody response and protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection across eight vaccine platforms 1 . The efficacy results from a phase 2b/3 trial of a ninth vaccine candidate, CVnCoV (CUREVAC), was announced on 16 June 2021 2 . The low efficacy of this new mRNA vaccine, which showed only 47% protection from symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, was surprising given the high efficacy of two previous mRNA-based vaccines 3,4 . A number of factors have been suggested to play a role in the low efficacy in the CVnCoV study, particularly around the dose and immunogenicity of the vaccine (which uses an unmodified mRNA construct 5,6 ) and the potential role of infection with SARS-CoV-2 variants (which were the dominant strains observed in the CVnCoV trial) 2 . | en |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.rights | Other | |
| dc.subject | COVID-19 | en |
| dc.subject | Coronavirus | en |
| dc.title | Relating in vitro neutralisation level and protection in the CVnCoV (CUREVAC) trial | en |
| dc.type | Preprint | en |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1101/2021.06.29.21259504 | |
| usyd.faculty | Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences | en |
Associated file/s
There are no files associated with this item.
Associated collections