Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCromer, Deborahen
dc.contributor.authorReynaldi, Arnolden
dc.contributor.authorSteain, Meganen
dc.contributor.authorTriccas, James Aen
dc.contributor.authorDavenport, Miles Pen
dc.contributor.authorKhoury, David Sen
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T05:05:11Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T05:05:11Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/27047
dc.description.abstractAbstract A recent study analysed the relationship between neutralising antibody response and protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection across eight vaccine platforms 1 . The efficacy results from a phase 2b/3 trial of a ninth vaccine candidate, CVnCoV (CUREVAC), was announced on 16 June 2021 2 . The low efficacy of this new mRNA vaccine, which showed only 47% protection from symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, was surprising given the high efficacy of two previous mRNA-based vaccines 3,4 . A number of factors have been suggested to play a role in the low efficacy in the CVnCoV study, particularly around the dose and immunogenicity of the vaccine (which uses an unmodified mRNA construct 5,6 ) and the potential role of infection with SARS-CoV-2 variants (which were the dominant strains observed in the CVnCoV trial) 2 .en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsOther
dc.subjectCOVID-19en
dc.subjectCoronavirusen
dc.titleRelating in vitro neutralisation level and protection in the CVnCoV (CUREVAC) trialen
dc.typePreprinten
dc.identifier.doi10.1101/2021.06.29.21259504
usyd.facultyFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciencesen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.