Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTymula, Agnieszka
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-12T05:10:35Z
dc.date.available2021-10-12T05:10:35Z
dc.date.issued2019en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/26412
dc.description.abstractThe majority of deaths in adolescence have been attributed to “risky” behaviors (Eaton et al., 2012) and therefore could be avoided had the adolescent made a different decision. In this paper, using two laboratory experiments we assess the impact of peer observation (a possible culprit of bad decision-making in adolescence) on the behavior of adolescents in risky conditions. We carefully separate risk attitudes from impatience, present bias, ambiguity attitudes, and inconsistency and in contradiction to what has been suggested in developmental psychology, we find that adolescents’ risk and ambiguity attitudes are not affected by observation. Instead, when observed by peers, adolescents become more impatient and inconsistent.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherElsevieren_AU
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Economic Behavior & Organizationen_AU
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden_AU
dc.subjectAdolescenceen_AU
dc.subjectDecision makingen_AU
dc.subjectObservationen_AU
dc.titleAn experimental study of adolescent behavior under peer observation: Adolescents are more impatient and inconsistent, not more risk-taking, when observed by peersen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jebo.2019.08.014
dc.relation.arcDE150101032
dc.relation.arcCE140100027
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences::School of Economicsen_AU
usyd.citation.volume166en_AU
usyd.citation.spage735en_AU
usyd.citation.epage750en_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.