Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAkhtaruzzaman, M.en_AU
dc.contributor.authorBoubaker, S.en_AU
dc.contributor.authorLucey, B.M.en_AU
dc.contributor.authorSensoy, A.en_AU
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-03T00:57:14Z
dc.date.available2021-08-03T00:57:14Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/25829
dc.description.abstractThis study examines the role of gold as a hedge or safe-haven asset in different phases of the COVID-19 pandemic crisis, corresponding to the timing of fiscal and monetary stimuli to support the weakened economy. Using high-frequency data, the results show that gold served as a safe-haven asset for stock markets during Phase I (December 31, 2019-March 16, 2020) of the pandemic. However, gold lost its safe-haven role during Phase II (March 17-April 24, 2020). The optimal weights of gold in S&P 500, Euro Stoxx 50, Nikkei 225, and WTI crude oil portfolios significantly increased during Phase II, suggesting that investors expanded investment in gold as a 'flight-to-safety asset' during the crisis. Further, hedging costs increased significantly during Phase II. These findings provide insight for individual and institutional investors and guidance to policymakers, regulators, and media on how gold evolved as a hedge and safe-haven asset in different phases of the pandemic.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_AU
dc.subjectCoronavirusen_AU
dc.titleIs gold a hedge or a safe-haven asset in the COVID-19 crisis?en_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.econmod.2021.105588


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.