Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLi, Xiangyi
dc.contributor.authorCastellanos, Sebastian
dc.contributor.authorMaassen, Anne
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-26
dc.date.available2018-11-26
dc.date.issued2017-01-01
dc.identifier.citationInternational Conference Series on Competition and Ownership in Land Passenger Transport – 2017 - Stockholm, Sweden - Thredbo 15en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/19576
dc.descriptionPapers - Workshop 5 Bridging the benefit / funding gapen_AU
dc.description.abstractElectric buses have environmental, economic, and health benefits, which many cities want to achieve by transitioning their fleets. However, the actual worldwide electric bus adoption is geographically uneven and limited in scale, and few studies analyzed what factors can potentially shape a wider adoption. The paper is based on real world experiences, and applies a comparative multi-case study to 22 cities in 14 countries. A common framework is used for analysis, which includes non-reimbursable funds, investment capital, and legal arrangements. Results show that four key factors are shaping the widespread adoption of electric buses. Firstly, public and private grants, which, when dedicated to cleaning the fleet, appears as a strong factor underpinning existing clean bus systems. Secondly, less costly sources of financing can reduce financial risks and enable more adoption, and it is where innovation can happen. Also, innovative ways of structuring contractual implementation effectively connect stakeholders and involve third-party players, which leads to shared and mitigated risks, increased efficiency and improved performance. In addition, some other elements outside of the business model framework also prove to be enabling the adoption of electric buses.en_AU
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofseriesThredbo 15en_AU
dc.subjectThredbo 15 - Papers - Workshop 5en_AU
dc.titleCurrent trends and innovations affecting the potential for a widespread adoption of electric buses - A comparative case study of 22 cities in the Americas, Asia-Pacific and Europeen_AU
dc.typeConference paperen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.