Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStopher, Peter
dc.contributor.authorShen, Li
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Wen
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, Asif
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-21
dc.date.available2018-11-21
dc.date.issued2015-03-01
dc.identifier.issnISSN 1832-570X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/19136
dc.description.abstractThe increasing use of GPS as a substitute or complement to conventional travel surveys has brought with it an increasing need for a reliable source of ground truth, i.e., information on the actual travel in which each respondent engaged, including the mode and purpose of such travel. Over the past decade or so, the main source that has been used for providing ground truth is the prompted recall survey. As the survey task has become less of a challenge, it has become evident that the prompted recall survey is subject to many of the same shortcomings as most selfadministered surveys, with reporting error, misunderstanding of what constitutes a trip, etc. In this paper, we review some of the common problems encountered in prompted recall surveys, especially those undertaken at some period of time after the GPS survey was undertaken, and using self-report methods. Following this, the paper describes a recent experiment in using life-logging cameras to record a person’s travel, together with GPS, thereby providing a new source of ground truth data that is not subject to processing issues of the GPS data, nor to self-report or other issues with prompted recall data.en_AU
dc.relation.ispartofseriesITLS‐WP‐15‐06en_AU
dc.subjectchallengeen_AU
dc.subjectground truthen_AU
dc.subjectGPSen_AU
dc.subjectSenseCamen_AU
dc.subjectprompted recall.en_AU
dc.titleThe challenge of obtaining ground truth for GPS processingen_AU
dc.typeWorking Paperen_AU
dc.contributor.departmentITLSen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.