Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMcCoy, Henry James
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-01
dc.date.available2014-04-01
dc.date.issued2013-01-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/10251
dc.description.abstractThis thesis investigates the reasons why it took seventy-four years for the International Criminal Court to be officially established in Rome in 1998 after the idea for the Court was first mooted in 1924. It is argued that the processes of myth-construction were pivotal in contributing to the Court’s enduring identity crisis throughout this period. Based on evidence pertinent to this inquiry, the thesis challenges the conventional histories that frame the Court’s evolution within a teleological development of international criminal law. The jurists, Dr Hugh H.L. Bellot (1860–1928) and Sir Hersch Lauterpacht (1897–1960) are key sources in supporting the ultimate hypothesis proposed here – that is, the recent perceptions of the Court’s genesis within the late nineteenth century Red Cross movement originated from the 1998 Rome Conference. This strategic myth was orchestrated with the chief purpose of unifying the interests of national delegates and international Civil Society by suppressing any future political doubt of the Court’s humanitarian function.en_AU
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.rightsThe author retains copyright of this thesisen
dc.subjectInternational Criminal Courten_AU
dc.subjectInternational Lawen_AU
dc.subjectInternational Traditionsen_AU
dc.subjectSir Hersch Lauterpachten_AU
dc.subjectDr Hugh H.L. Belloten_AU
dc.subjectRed Crossen_AU
dc.titleThe International Criminal Court: Mapping the Politics of Myth Construction on the "Road to Rome"en_AU
dc.typeThesis, Honoursen_AU
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Historyen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.