Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEdwards, Ben
dc.contributor.authorFiorini, Mario
dc.contributor.authorStevens, Katrien
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Matthew
dc.date.accessioned2013-04-05
dc.date.available2013-04-05
dc.date.issued2013-04-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/9020
dc.description.abstractWhenever treatment effects are heterogeneous and there is sorting into treatment based on the gain, monotonicity is a condition that both Instrumental Variable and fuzzy Regression Discontinuity designs have to satisfy for their estimand to be interpretable as a LATE. Angrist and Imbens (1995) argue that the monotonicity assumption is testable whenever the treatment is multivalued. We show that their test is informative if counterfactuals are observed. Yet applying the test without observing counterfactuals, as it is generally done, is not. Nevertheless, we argue that monotonicity can and should be investigated using a mix of economic intuition and data patterns, just like other untestable assumptions in an IV or RD design. We provide examples in a variety of settings as a guide to practice.en
dc.language.isoen_AUen
dc.publisherSchool of Economicsen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking papers Discipline of Economicsen
dc.rightsOther
dc.titleIs Monotonicity in an IV and RD design testable? No, but you can still check iten
dc.typeWorking Paperen
usyd.facultyFaculty of Arts and Social Sciences, School of Economics
usyd.citation.issue2013-06en


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.