A Post-Colonial Comment on Collins
Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Clegg, Stewart | |
dc.contributor.author | van Krieken, Robert | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-05-05 | |
dc.date.available | 2006-05-05 | |
dc.date.issued | 2006-05-05 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2123/900 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper responds to Randall Collins' critique of R.W. Connell's 1997 paper, 'Why is classical theory classical' arguing that the the history of the discipline should in fact be redrawn. | en |
dc.format.extent | 101407 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://www.usyd.edu.au/disclaimer.shtml | |
dc.subject | Sociology | en |
dc.subject | history | en |
dc.subject | colonialism | en |
dc.subject | theory | en |
dc.title | A Post-Colonial Comment on Collins | en |
dc.type | Working Paper | en |
Associated file/s
Associated collections