Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChong, Sophia
dc.contributor.authorGuillén, Pablo
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-03
dc.date.available2012-02-03
dc.date.issued2012-02-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/8090
dc.description.abstractWe compare individual with collective contracts using variations of a repeated gift- exchange game. Firms consist of one employer and three workers. In the individual variation (I) different workers can receive separate wages. In the collective variation (C) workers receive the same wage. I and C are played altering the order across sessions resulting in four treatments: 1I, 1C, 2I, 2C. The wage offered in the first period of 1C is significantly higher than the wage offered in the first period of 1I. Average wage and effort become indistinguishable in phase 1 afterwards. Individual contracts resulted on higher average effort but undistinguishable wages when comparing 2I with 2C. In spite of an experimental design favourable to individual contracts, collective contracts fared unexpectedly well.en_AU
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherSchool of Economicsen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofseries2012-03en_AU
dc.subjectlaboratory experimentsen_AU
dc.subjectgift exchangeen_AU
dc.subjectcollective contractsen_AU
dc.titleThe discreet charm of the collective contracten_AU
dc.typeWorking Paperen_AU
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Economicsen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.