Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGal, Ofer
dc.contributor.authorChen-Morris, Raz
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-07
dc.date.available2011-11-07
dc.date.issued2010-04-01
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the History of Ideas, Volume 71, Number 2, April 2010, pp. 191-217en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/7873
dc.description.abstractIn the seventeenth century the human observer gradually disappeared from optical treatises. It was a paradoxical process: the naturalization of the eye estranged the mind from its objects. Turned into a material optical instrument, the eye no longer furnished the observer with genuine representations of visible objects. It became a mere screen, on which rested a blurry array of light stains, accidental effects of a purely causal process. It thus befell the intellect to decipher one natural object—a flat image of no inherent epistemic value—as the vague, reversed reflection of another, wholly independent object. In reflecting on and trespassing the boundaries between natural and artificial, orderly and disorderly, this optical paradox was a Baroque intellectual phenomenon; and it was the origin of Descartes’ celebrated doubt— whether we know anything at all.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherUniversity of Pennsylvania Pressen_AU
dc.subjectBaroqueen_AU
dc.subjectopticsen_AU
dc.subjectDescartesen_AU
dc.subjectseventeenth century scienceen_AU
dc.subjectEarly Modern Scienceen_AU
dc.subjectKepleren_AU
dc.titleBaroque Optics and the Disappearance of the Observer: From Kepler’s Optics to Descartes’ Doubten_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.subject.asrc220206en_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1353/jhi.0.0076
dc.type.pubtypePublisher's versionen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.