Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKim, David
dc.contributor.authorSheen, Jeffrey
dc.date.accessioned2011-06-07
dc.date.available2011-06-07
dc.date.issued2005-05-01
dc.identifier.isbn1864877227
dc.identifier.issn1446-3806
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/7637
dc.description.abstractquantify how output risks are smoothed within Australia, and between Australia and New Zealand. About 85 percent of shocks were smoothed within Australia through credit and capital markets, with fiscal policy a source of dis-smoothing after 1992. Risk-sharing between Australia and New Zealand was greater than within Europe, occurring mostly through credit markets. With fully integrated financial markets between Australia and New Zealand since 1960, the average welfare gain would be 2.7 percent of certainty-equivalent consumption over 50 years, although these gains favour New Zealand. Australia’s gains are from the pooling of PPP risks. These potential gains were largely resolved by the deregulations and CER trade agreement of the early1980s.en
dc.language.isoen_AUen
dc.publisherDepartment of Economicsen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking papers Discipline of Economicsen
dc.rightsOther
dc.subjectRisk-sharingen
dc.subjecthorizontal fiscal equalizationen
dc.subjectcommon currencyen
dc.subjectwelfare gains from integrationen
dc.titleConsumption Risk-sharing within Australia and with New Zealanden
dc.typeWorking Paperen
usyd.facultyFaculty of Arts and Social Sciences, School of Economics
usyd.citation.issue2005-6en


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.