Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWright, Donald J.
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-23
dc.date.available2011-05-23
dc.date.issued1991-09-01
dc.identifier.isbn0867587075
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/7435
dc.description.abstractThis paper develops a two period model in which a dynamic external economy, in the form of learning-by-doing spillovers, provides the rationale for infant industry assistance are then examined by introducing owner/manager effort into the learning process. It is shown, under conditions of symmetric information, that temporary assistance is optimal. Under conditions of asymmetric information, it is shown that a form of permanent assistance is optimal if the policy maker can commit to a Period 1 per unit output subsidy and a Period 2 lump-sum subsidy contingent on Period 2 output.en
dc.language.isoen_AUen
dc.publisherDepartment of Economicsen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers in Economicsen
dc.rightsOther
dc.titlePERMANENT vs. TEMPORARY INFANT INDUSTRY ASSISTANCEen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
usyd.facultyFaculty of Arts and Social Sciences, School of Economics
usyd.citation.issue164en


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.