Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorErmini, Luigi
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-15
dc.date.available2011-05-15
dc.date.issued1989-06-01
dc.identifier.isbn094926976X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/7352
dc.description.abstractThe error term in the equation defining the permanent income hypothesis is sometimes viewed in the literature as transitory consumption (generated by the agent), and is sometimes viewed as measurement error (generated by the observer). In both cases, it is usually assumed to be white noise. Sometimes it is ignored altogether, assumed to be identically zero. Using empirical evidence that combines both monthly and quarterly data, this paper shows that the error term in the permanent income equation cannot be identically zero, and that the presence of both transitory consumption and measurement errors can be consistent with the data. The evidence also confirms that the best model for this term is indeed a white noise process.en_AU
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherDepartment of Economicsen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofseries124en_AU
dc.titleTransitory Consumption and Measurement Errors in the Permanent Income Hypothesisen_AU
dc.typeWorking Paperen_AU
dc.contributor.departmentEconomicsen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.