Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMills, Gordon
dc.contributor.authorHowe, Martin
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-21
dc.date.available2010-09-21
dc.date.issued1999-01-01
dc.identifier.citationInternational Conference Series on Competition and Ownership in Land Passenger Transport – 1999 - Cape Town, South Africa – Thredbo 6en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/6590
dc.descriptionTheme 5en
dc.description.abstractThe appraisal of proposals for adding or withdrawing individual rail services is inevitably complex, because it needs to recognise interdependence both within the rail network and between transport modes, and to account for externalities affecting non-users. Since 1960, British appraisal procedures have changed greatly, as has the institutional setting, especially following privatisation. In May 1999, the government regulator took a major step forward when it adopted the use of cost benefit analysis for the appraisal of non-commercial services. Yet there is a need for elaboration of the rules that deal with jointness in costs and in revenues, and for extension of the appraisal scheme to permit multi-modal application. Government policy-makers should also address institutional barriers that may hinder the development of valuable alternative supply arrangements, and instigate a review of existing marginal services to see if they are all worthwhile.en
dc.description.sponsorshipInstitute of Transport and Logistics Studies. Faculty of Economics and Business. The University of Sydneyen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesThredboen
dc.rightsOtheren
dc.titleAppraisal of Non-commercial Passenger Rail Services in Britainen
dc.typeConference paperen
dc.rights.otherCopyright the University of Sydneyen
usyd.facultyThe University of Sydney Business School, Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies (ITLS)en
usyd.citation.volume6


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.