Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHayes, A.J.en
dc.contributor.authorWithers, H.G.en
dc.contributor.authorGlinsky, J.V.en
dc.contributor.authorChu, J.en
dc.contributor.authorJennings, M.D.en
dc.contributor.authorStarkey, I.en
dc.contributor.authorParmeter, R.en
dc.contributor.authorBoulos, M.en
dc.contributor.authorCruwys, J.J.en
dc.contributor.authorDuong, K.en
dc.contributor.authorJordan, I.en
dc.contributor.authorWong, D.en
dc.contributor.authorTrang, S.en
dc.contributor.authorDuong, M.en
dc.contributor.authorLiu, H.en
dc.contributor.authorLambert, T.E.en
dc.contributor.authorZadro, J.R.en
dc.contributor.authorSherrington, C.en
dc.contributor.authorMaher, C.en
dc.contributor.authorLucas, B.R.en
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, D.en
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, M.L.en
dc.contributor.authorHarvey, L.A.en
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-03T23:48:04Z
dc.date.available2026-05-03T23:48:04Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/35233
dc.description.abstractQUESTIONS: Is remotely delivered physiotherapy cost saving when compared with usual face-to-face physiotherapy as typically provided in a public hospital outpatient setting? Is remotely delivered physiotherapy cost-effective? DESIGN: Economic evaluation embedded within a randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial using a health system plus patient perspective. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with musculoskeletal conditions presenting to Sydney public hospitals for physiotherapy treatment. INTERVENTION: REFORM was a randomised controlled trial comparing remotely delivered physiotherapy with usual care provided in an outpatient setting. Remotely delivered physiotherapy involved one face-to-face physiotherapy session in conjunction with text messages, phone calls and an individualised exercise program delivered through an 'App'. OUTCOME MEASURES: The economic evaluation included the Patient Specific Functional Scale at 6 weeks in the cost-minimisation and cost-effectiveness analyses, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at 26 weeks in the cost-utility analysis. Health system and patient resource use were derived from patient self-report. RESULTS: Costs per participant over 6 weeks were AUD $742 for remotely delivered physiotherapy and $910 for face-to-face physiotherapy, with a mean cost difference of -$168 (95% CI -$339 to $1). There was a 98% probability of remotely delivered physiotherapy being cost saving within the non-inferiority margin of the Patient Specific Functional Scale, and an 88% probability of being dominant to face-to-face physiotherapy (less costly and more effective). There was a 51% probability of being cost-effective at a nominal $50,000/QALY threshold. CONCLUSION: Moving people with musculoskeletal conditions to a remote model of physiotherapy care is potentially cost saving for health systems and patients, without compromising health outcomes when compared with currently provided public hospital care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12619000065190.en
dc.language.isoen_AUen
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden
dc.subject3205 Clinical Sciencesen
dc.titleRemotely delivered physiotherapy for musculoskeletal conditions is cost saving for the health system and patients: economic evaluation of the REFORM randomised trialen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jphys.2025.06.006
dc.relation.grantAPP1194105
usyd.facultyFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciencesen
usyd.departmentInstitute for Musculoskeletal Healthen
usyd.citation.volume71
usyd.citation.issue3
usyd.citation.spage179


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.