Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGan, J.F.L.en
dc.contributor.authorMcKay, M.J.en
dc.contributor.authorJones, C.M.P.en
dc.contributor.authorHarris, I.A.en
dc.contributor.authorMcCaffery, K.en
dc.contributor.authorThompson, R.en
dc.contributor.authorHoffmann, T.C.en
dc.contributor.authorAdie, S.en
dc.contributor.authorMaher, C.G.en
dc.contributor.authorZadro, J.R.en
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-03T23:47:54Z
dc.date.available2026-05-03T23:47:54Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/35197
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To develop and user-test a patient decision aid portraying the benefits and harms of non-surgical management and surgery for Achilles tendon ruptures. DESIGN: Mixed methods. SETTING: A draft decision aid was developed using guidance from a multidisciplinary steering group and existing patient decision aids. Participants were recruited through social media. PARTICIPANTS: People who have previously sustained an Achilles tendon rupture and health professionals who manage these patients. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Semi-structured interviews and questionnaires were used to gather feedback on the decision aid from health professionals and patients who had previously suffered an Achilles tendon rupture. The feedback was used to redraft the decision aid and assess acceptability. An iterative cycle of interviews, redrafting according to feedback and further interviews was used. Interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Questionnaire data were analysed descriptively. RESULTS: We interviewed 18 health professionals (13 physiotherapists, 3 orthopaedic surgeons, 1 chiropractor, 1 sports medicine physician) and 15 patients who had suffered an Achilles tendon rupture (median time since rupture was 12 months). Most health professionals and patients rated the aid's acceptability as good-excellent. Interviews showcased agreement among health professionals and patients on most aspects of the decision aid: introduction, treatment options, comparing benefits and harms, questions to ask health professionals and formatting. However, health professionals had differing views on details about Achilles tendon retraction distance, factors that modify the risk of harms, treatment protocols and evidence on benefits and harms. CONCLUSION: Our patient decision aid is an acceptable tool to both patients and health professionals, and our study highlights the views of key stakeholders on important information to consider when developing a patient decision aid for Achilles tendon rupture management. A randomised controlled trial evaluating the impact of this tool on the decision-making of people considering Achilles tendon surgery is warranted.en
dc.language.isoen_AUen
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden
dc.subjectDecision Makingen
dc.subjectMusculoskeletal disordersen
dc.subject3205 Clinical Sciencesen
dc.titleDeveloping a patient decision aid for Achilles tendon rupture management: a mixed-methods studyen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072553
dc.relation.grantAPP1194105
usyd.facultyFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciencesen
usyd.departmentInstitute for Musculoskeletal Healthen
usyd.citation.volume13
usyd.citation.issue6
usyd.citation.spagee072553


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.