Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRobertson, A.en
dc.contributor.authorBirch, M.en
dc.contributor.authorHarris, I.A.en
dc.contributor.authorBuchbinder, R.en
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, G.en
dc.contributor.authorO'Keeffe, M.en
dc.contributor.authorMaher, C.G.en
dc.contributor.authorZadro, J.R.en
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-03T23:47:46Z
dc.date.available2026-05-03T23:47:46Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/35165
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To summarize the proportion of consumer webpages on subacromial decompression and rotator cuff repair surgery that make an accurate portrayal of the evidence for these operations (primary outcome), mention the benefits and harms of surgery, outline alternatives to surgery, and make various surgical recommendations. DESIGN: Content analysis. SETTING: Online consumer information about subacromial decompression and rotator cuff repair surgery. Webpages were identified through (1) Google searches using terms synonymous with "shoulder pain" and "shoulder surgery" and searching "orthopedic surgeon" linked to each Australian capital city and (2) websites of relevant professional associations (eg, Australian Orthopaedic Association). Two reviewers independently identified webpages and extracted data. PARTICIPANTS: Not applicable. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Whether the webpage made an accurate portrayal of the evidence for subacromial decompression or rotator cuff repair surgery (primary outcome), mentioned benefits and harms of surgery, outlined alternatives to surgery, and made various surgical recommendations (eg, delay surgery). Outcome data were summarized using counts and percentages. RESULTS: A total of 155 webpages were analyzed (n=89 on subacromial decompression, n=90 on rotator cuff repair, n=24 on both). Only 18% (n=16) and 4% (n=4) of webpages made an accurate portrayal of the evidence for subacromial decompression and rotator cuff repair surgery, respectively. For subacromial decompression and rotator cuff repair, respectively, 85% (n=76) and 80% (n=72) of webpages mentioned benefits, 38% (n=34) and 47% (n=42) mentioned harms, 94% (n=84) and 92% (n=83) provided alternatives to surgery, and 63% (n=56) and 62% (n=56) recommended delayed surgery (the most common recommendation). CONCLUSIONS: Most online information about subacromial decompression and rotator cuff repair surgery does not accurately portray the best available evidence for surgery and may be inadequate to inform patient decision making.en
dc.language.isoen_AUen
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden
dc.subjectInterneten
dc.subjectOrthopedic proceduresen
dc.subject3205 Clinical Sciencesen
dc.titleOnline Information About the Effectiveness of Shoulder Surgery Is Not Based on the Best Available Evidence: A Content Analysisen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.apmr.2021.03.041
dc.relation.grantAPP1194105
usyd.facultyFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciencesen
usyd.departmentInstitute for Musculoskeletal Healthen
usyd.citation.volume102
usyd.citation.issue11
usyd.citation.spage2141


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.