Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDécary, S.en
dc.contributor.authorZadro, J.R.en
dc.contributor.authorO'Keeffe, M.en
dc.contributor.authorMichaleff, Z.A.en
dc.contributor.authorTraeger, A.C.en
dc.contributor.authorLégaré, F.en
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-03T23:47:43Z
dc.date.available2026-05-03T23:47:43Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/35155
dc.description.abstractShared decision making is recommended as a strategy to help patients identify what matters most to them and make informed decisions about musculoskeletal care. In part 5 of the Overcoming Overuse series, we look at the evidence supporting shared decision making as a strategy to help curb overuse. Using shared decision making in clinical consultations may help to reduce the overuse of options that are not beneficial and to increase use of care supported by evidence. Shared decision making could support clinicians in promoting uptake of active rehabilitation options with a favorable balance of benefits to harms. Shared decision making facilitates conversations about unnecessary tests or treatments and could be a key strategy for overcoming overuse. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2021;51(2):53-56. doi:10.2519/jospt.2021.0103.en
dc.language.isoen_AUen
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden
dc.subject3205 Clinical Sciencesen
dc.titleOvercoming Overuse Part 5: Is Shared Decision Making Our Excalibur?en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.2519/jospt.2021.0103
dc.relation.grantAPP1194105
usyd.facultyFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciencesen
usyd.departmentInstitute for Musculoskeletal Healthen
usyd.citation.volume51
usyd.citation.issue2
usyd.citation.spage53


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.