Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShieh, Chun-Chien
dc.contributor.authorKeall, Paul
dc.contributor.authorJia, Xun
dc.contributor.authorGonzalez, Yesenia
dc.contributor.authorLi, Bin
dc.contributor.authorRit, Simon
dc.coverage.spatialSydney, New South Walesen
dc.coverage.temporal2018en
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-06T23:17:55Z
dc.date.available2025-10-06T23:17:55Z
dc.date.issued2019en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/34378
dc.description.abstractThe goal of the SPARE challenge was to explore the possibility of high quality 4D CBCT while sparing patients the additional scan time and imaging dose that was currently used in the clinics. 4D CBCT allowed the verification of tumor motion for thoracic patients immediately before every radiotherapy session. A clinical 4D CBCT scan took 2–4 minutes, as compared to one minute for a 3D CBCT scan. The recent emergence of image reconstruction algorithms that accounted for data sparsity offered new possibility for 4D CBCT reconstruction using a shorter scan. Specifically, the ability to reconstruct 4D CBCT images from a one minute scan would have reduced scan time and imaging dose. Additionally, every radiotherapy centre would have gained access to 4D CBCT using existing 3D CBCT scanning protocol. Participants received CBCT projection data either acquired clinically or simulated. Prior CT data and training sets were also be provided. Using these datasets, participants applied their reconstruction algorithms and submitted the final reconstructions to the host within a timeframe of three months. The participants were allowed to apply any processing and algorithms to reconstruct the 4D CBCT images, including scatter correction, projection smoothing, iterative correction, etc. Together with the reconstruction submission, the participants were asked to include descriptions of the methods they applied. The host evaluated the performance of each algorithm using a set of ground truths that were not available to the participants. The best performing algorithms in terms of image quality and accuracy were identified.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherAmerican Association of Physicists in Medicineen
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13687
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0en
dc.subjectCone Beam Computed Tomographyen
dc.subjectRapid scanen
dc.subjectradiation therapyen
dc.titleThe Sparse-view Reconstruction Challenge for Four-dimensional Cone-beam CT Dataseten
dc.typeDataseten
dc.subject.asrc321110en
dc.subject.asrc400304en
dc.subject.asrc510502en
dc.description.methodThere are three main datasets in this challenge: For each CBCT scan, the participants received both the raw projection data and a 4D CT scan to be used as a prior. In addition, one or more training cases will be provided, where both the raw projection data and the ground truth reconstructions were available. Monte Carlo dataset This dataset contains projections simulated from real patient 4D CTs, which are the ground truths for evaluating the reconstructed images. A total of 12 patients and 32 scans are included. There are three different types of simulated projections: no scatter, scatter, and low dose. This allows the comparisons of both reconstruction algorithms and scatter correction. Clinical Varian dataset This dataset contains oversampled clinical CBCT projections acquired from a Varian system using half-fan geometry. A total of 5 patients and 30 scans are included. The 4D CBCT reconstructed from the oversampled projection sets are used as the ground truths. The participants received the down-sampled projection sets. Clinical Elekta dataset This dataset contains oversampled clinical CBCT projections acquired from an Elekta system using full-fan geometry. A total of 6 patients and 24 scans are included. Similarly to the clinical Varian dataset, reconstructions from the oversampled projection sets are used as the ground truths, while the participants received the down-sampled projection sets.en
dc.bitstream.urlhttps://ses-data.library.sydney.edu.au/public/34378_Shieh/SPARE_PublicArchive.zip
dc.relation.otherThe American Association of Physicists in Medicine provided some support for the challenge but there was not grant
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Healthen
usyd.departmentImage X Instituteen
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen
dc.relation.issupplementtoSPARE: Sparse-view reconstruction challenge for 4D cone-beam CT from a 1-min scan


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.