MArkerless lung target Tracking CHallenge (MATCH) dataset - Part A
| Field | Value | Language |
| dc.contributor.author | Mueller, Marco | |
| dc.contributor.author | Poulsen, Per | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hansen, Rune | |
| dc.contributor.author | Verbakel, Wilko | |
| dc.contributor.author | Keall, Paul | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Data collected at Aarhus University, Denmark | en |
| dc.coverage.temporal | 2020 | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-10-06T22:42:08Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-10-06T22:42:08Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2123/34376 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The MATCH challenge stands for Markerless Lung Target Tracking Challenge. The aim is to systematically investigate and benchmark the accuracy of various approaches for lung tumour motion tracking during radiation therapy in both a retrospective simulation study (Part A) and a prospective phantom experiment (Part B). What is the Rationale? The goal of the MATCH challenge is to explore the possibility of tracking lung tumour motion without the cost and risk of surgically inserted fiducial markers at the time that is needed most – in real-time during the radiation treatment. Lung cancer stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy (SABR) is one of the cancer treatment success stories. The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Groups 76 1 (respiratory motion management) and 1012 (stereotactic body radiation therapy) have highlighted the need for accurate target tracking during radiation therapy. To further improve patient safety for SABR, reduce margins and account for the breath-to-breath and day-to-day variation in lung tumour motion several commercial and academic markerless lung target tracking algorithms have been developed. These algorithms have yet to be benchmarked using a common prospective measurement methodology. This knowledge gap motivated the Markerless Lung Target Tracking Challenge. The Challenge The MATCH challenge consists of two parts: (Part A) in-silico study based on images with unknown motion and (Part B) experimental phantom measurements with patient-measured motion. The challenge is open to any participant, and participants can complete either one or both parts of the challenge. This data set is for Part A of the Challenge. Any study that makes use of the MATCH Challenge dataset should cite the following reference: https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.15418 | en |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.publisher | The University of Sydney | en |
| dc.relation.uri | https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.15418 | |
| dc.relation.uri | https://www.aapm.org/GrandChallenge/MATCH/ | |
| dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 | en |
| dc.subject | respiratory motion | en |
| dc.subject | lung radiation therapy | en |
| dc.subject | image-guidance | en |
| dc.title | MArkerless lung target Tracking CHallenge (MATCH) dataset - Part A | en |
| dc.type | Dataset | en |
| dc.subject.asrc | 321110 | en |
| dc.subject.asrc | 400304 | en |
| dc.subject.asrc | 510502 | en |
| dc.description.method | The image and planning data for Part A of MATCH (MArkerless Lung Target Tracking Challenge) were generated at Aarhus University Hospital using a 3D printed thorax phantom mounted on a HexaMotion motion stage. Anyone is welcome to use the MATCH Challenge datasets for their research. Any study that makes use of the MATCH Challenge dataset should cite the following reference. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.15418 The data available for download are described in the following: CT scans and treatment plans The phantom has three tumors in the right lung: A low density tumor in the caudal part of the lung (not used in MATCH) and two tumors close to water density in the middle part (Tumor 1) and cranial part (Tumor 2) of the lung. For treatment planning, the GTV was delineated as the tumor in the mid-ventilation phase of a 4DCT scan with 1.5mm slice thickness (Siemens SOMATOM go.Open Pro scanner). The GTV was propagated to the other 4DCT phases by deformable contour propagation, and an iGTV was constructed by accumulating the GTV volumes of all phases. The iGTV was transferred to a 3DCT scan with 0.6mm slice thickness acquired with the phantom in a static position. The PTV was generated by adding 5mm isotropic margins. Using the 3DCT scan a single arc VMAT 6X FFF plan (1400 MU/min) was made for Tumor 1 and Tumor 2 in Eclipse following the RTOG0915 guidelines with 48Gy/4fx to the PTV. For Tumor 1 and Tumor 2, the isocenter of the plan in the 3DCT scan defines the origin of the motion during treatment delivery in MATCH, i.e. perfect alignment of the tumor at treatment corresponds to the position (0,0,0) in the MATCH Challenge. CT scans and treatment planning data for MATCH: Plan 1 (Tumor 1): Planning 3DCT scan, structure set, RT plan and RT dose matrix available as DICOM files. Plan 2 (Tumor 2): Planning 3DCT scan, structure set, RT plan and RT dose matrix available as DICOM files. 4DCT scan available DICOM files. Setup CBCT scans One 3D and one 4D CBCT scan recorded with motion for both Plan1 (“High Complexity Motion†trajectory) and Plan2 (“Mean Motion Range†trajectory) 3D CBCT: Based on 895 projection images recorded at 15Hz during 360deg rotation in 60 seconds. Available as Varian XIM files Reconstructed with 88 slices with 515 x 512 pixels. Available as DICOM files. 4D CBCT: Based on 838 projection images recorded at 7Hz during 360deg rotation in 120 seconds. Available as Varian XIM file. Reconstructed with 11 phases each with 117 slices with 384 x 384 pixels. Available as DICOM files, where the phase is identified by the SeriesNumber (5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25) and the slices in a phase are identified by InstanceNumber (1, 2,…, 117). Intra-treatment images Plan 1 and Plan 2 were both delivered twice to the moving phantom using the “High Complexity Motion†and “High Motion Range†trajectories for Plan 1 and “Mean Complexity Motion†and “Mean Motion Range†trajectories for Plan 2. Cine MV images were recorded with 12.7 Hz. Available as DICOM files. Perpendicular kV images were recorded with 11 Hz. A symmetric 7cm x 7cm field size was emulated by masking out pixels outside this area. However, for Plan 2, the field size was further reduced by 1.5cm cranially to an asymmetric field of 5.5cm x 7cm to avoid visibility of the cranial end of the phantom in the images during inhale. Available as DICOM files. | en |
| dc.bitstream.url | https://ses-data.library.sydney.edu.au/public/34376_Mueller/MATCH upload.zip | |
| dc.relation.other | Support provided by American Association of Physicists in Medcine | |
| usyd.faculty | SeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health | en |
| usyd.department | Image X Institute | en |
| workflow.metadata.only | No | en |
Associated file/s
Associated collections