The Selection of a Defective Major Premise
Access status:
Open Access
Type
ArticleAbstract
In a common law system of reasoning, there is no definitive method to identify the correct legal rule, or major premise, from which there proceeds the reasoning to the result. At a more fundamental level, there are also no a priori rules to determine the correct level of generality at which to pitch the scope of that premise. Both remain selective processes which may lead to unsatisfactory outcomes. This is illustrated by our consideration of three recent decisions of courts of final appeal.In a common law system of reasoning, there is no definitive method to identify the correct legal rule, or major premise, from which there proceeds the reasoning to the result. At a more fundamental level, there are also no a priori rules to determine the correct level of generality at which to pitch the scope of that premise. Both remain selective processes which may lead to unsatisfactory outcomes. This is illustrated by our consideration of three recent decisions of courts of final appeal.
See less
See less
Date
2023Source title
Australian Bar ReviewVolume
53Publisher
Australian Bar ReviewFaculty/School
The University of Sydney Law SchoolShare