Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLevy, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Jingjing
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-28T23:09:43Z
dc.date.available2024-05-28T23:09:43Z
dc.date.issued2024en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/32590
dc.description.abstractWith a fixed prize budget, to increase total effort, we design a two-stage lottery contest where heterogeneous agents face the prospect of promotion and the threat of demotion from one stage to the next. We develop two competing theoretical models to generate predictions about behavior: (i) the standard economic model and (ii) a behavioral model where agents derive non-monetary utility from winning. The experimental results provide strong support for the use of promotion and demotion in contests when abilities are homogeneous, however, they do not provide strong support for the use of promotion and demotion in contests when ability differences are large. Our experimental results are consistent with the predictions made by the behavioral model.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherElsevieren_AU
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Economic Behavior & Organizationen_AU
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0en_AU
dc.titlePromotion and demotion contestsen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jebo.2024.01.004
dc.type.pubtypeAuthor accepted manuscripten_AU
dc.relation.arcCE200100025
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences::School of Economicsen_AU
usyd.citation.volume219en_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.