Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGrossman, Philip J.
dc.contributor.authorLevy, Jonathan
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-28T04:13:02Z
dc.date.available2024-05-28T04:13:02Z
dc.date.issued2024en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/32586
dc.description.abstractAttempts by charities to motivate giving tend to focus on potential donors’ altruistic tendencies. However, prior research suggests that approximately 50% of individuals are to some extent motivated by warm glow, the satisfaction received from the act of giving. The satisfaction derives from looking good to themselves (self-image) and/or to others (social image). We conduct an online experiment on MTurk participants (n = 960) with a more realistic simulation of being watched to determine the importance of self- and social image to warm-glow giving. We find evidence that suggests that social image concerns do not increase the likelihood that someone will give but they do increase the amount given; average giving is significantly higher in the treatments when feelings of being watched are stimulated. Our results suggest that charities looking to increase their donor bases might effectively do so by focusing on self-image concerns. Charities wishing to increase the amount donated might effectively do so by focusing on the social image concerns of the donor.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherPloSen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofPloS Oneen_AU
dc.titleIt’s not you (well, it is a bit you), it’s me: Self- versus social image in warm-glow givingen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0300868
dc.type.pubtypeAuthor accepted manuscripten_AU
dc.relation.arcCE200100025
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences::School of Economicsen_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.