Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSeidler, Lene
dc.contributor.authorLibesman, Sol
dc.contributor.authorHunter, Kylie
dc.contributor.authorBarba, Angie
dc.contributor.authorAberoumand, Mason
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorShrestha, Nipun
dc.contributor.authorAagerup, Jannik
dc.contributor.authorSotiropoulos, James
dc.contributor.authorMontgomery, Alan
dc.contributor.authorGyte, Gillian
dc.contributor.authorDuley, Lelia
dc.contributor.authorAskie, Lisa
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-15T05:27:50Z
dc.date.available2024-03-15T05:27:50Z
dc.date.issued2023en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/32376
dc.description.abstractBackground Deferred (also known as delayed) cord clamping can improve survival of infants born preterm (before 37 weeks of gestation), but the optimal duration of deferral remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and individual participant data network meta-analysis with the aim of comparing the effectiveness of umbilical cord clamping strategies with different timings of clamping or with cord milking for preterm infants. Methods We searched medical databases and trial registries from inception until Feb 24, 2022 (updated June 6, 2023) for randomised controlled trials comparing cord clamping strategies for preterm infants. Individual participant data were harmonised and assessed for risk of bias and quality. Interventions were grouped into immediate clamping, short deferral (≥15 s to <45 s), medium deferral (≥45 s to <120 s), long deferral (≥120 s), and intact cord milking. The primary outcome was death before hospital discharge. We calculated one-stage, intention-to-treat Bayesian random-effects individual participant data network meta-analysis. This study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42019136640. Findings We included individual participant data from 47 trials with 6094 participants. Of all interventions, long deferral reduced death before discharge the most (compared with immediate clamping; odds ratio 0·31 [95% credibility interval] 0·11–0·80; moderate certainty). The risk of bias was low for 10 (33%) of 30 trials, 14 (47%) had some concerns, and 6 (20%) were rated as having a high risk of bias. Heterogeneity was low, with no indication of inconsistency. Interpretation This study found that long deferral of clamping leads to reduced odds of death before discharge in preterm infants. In infants assessed as requiring immediate resuscitation, this finding might only be generalisable if there are provisions for such care with the cord intact. These results are based on thoroughly cleaned and checked individual participant data and can inform future guidelines and practice. Funding Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherLanceten_AU
dc.relation.ispartofLanceten_AU
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0en_AU
dc.titleShort, medium, and long deferral of umbilical cord clamping compared with umbilical cord milking and immediate clamping at preterm birth: a systematic review and network meta-analysis with individual participant dataen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02469-8
dc.type.pubtypeAuthor accepted manuscripten_AU
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::NHMRC Clinical Trials Centreen_AU
usyd.citation.volume402en_AU
usyd.citation.issue10418en_AU
usyd.citation.spage2223en_AU
usyd.citation.epage2234en_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.