Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGlimcher, Paul W.
dc.contributor.authorTymula, Agnieszka A.
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T05:37:52Z
dc.date.available2024-03-11T05:37:52Z
dc.date.issued2023en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/32345
dc.description.abstractWe present a descriptive model of choice derived from neuroscientific models of efficient value representation in the brain. Our basic model, a special case of Expected Utility Theory, can capture a number of behaviors predicted by Prospect Theory. It achieves this with only two parameters: a time-indexed “payoff expectation”(reference point) and a free parameter we call “predisposition”. A simple extension of the model outside the domain of Expected Utility also captures the Allais Paradox. Our models shed new light on the computational origins and evolution of risk attitudes and aversion to outcomes below reward expectation (reference point). It delivers novel explanations of the endowment effect, the observed heterogeneity in probability weighting functions, and the Allais Paradox, all with fewer parameters and higher descriptive accuracy than Prospect Theory.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherElsevieren_AU
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Economic Behavior & Organizationen_AU
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden_AU
dc.titleExpected subjective value theory (ESVT): A representation of decision under risk and certainty.en_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jebo.2022.12.013
dc.type.pubtypePublisher's versionen_AU
dc.relation.arcCE200100025
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Arts and Social Sciencesen_AU
usyd.citation.volume207en_AU
usyd.citation.spage110en_AU
usyd.citation.epage128en_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.