Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTurner, Robin M
dc.contributor.authorDieng, Mbathio
dc.contributor.authorKhanna, Nikita
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, Mai
dc.contributor.authorZeng, Jiaxu
dc.contributor.authorNijhuis, Amanda AG
dc.contributor.authorNieweg, Omgo E
dc.contributor.authorEinstein, Andrew J.
dc.contributor.authorEmmett, Louise
dc.contributor.authorLord, Sally J
dc.contributor.authorMenzies, Alexander M
dc.contributor.authorThompson, John F.
dc.contributor.authorSaw, Robyn PM
dc.contributor.authorMorton, Rachael L
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-14T01:56:13Z
dc.date.available2023-06-14T01:56:13Z
dc.date.issued2021en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/31340
dc.description.abstractBackground Follow-up for patients with resected stage IIIA–D melanoma may include computed tomography (CT) or positron emission tomography (PET)/CT imaging to identify distant metastases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the test performance over follow-up time, of structured 6- and 12-monthly follow-up imaging schedules in these patients. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive resected stage IIIA–D melanoma patients from Melanoma Institute Australia (2000–2017). Patients were followed until a confirmed diagnosis of distant metastasis, end of follow-up schedule, or death. Test accuracy was evaluated by cross-classifying the results of the test against a composite reference standard of histopathology, cytology, radiologic imaging, and/or clinical follow-up, and then quantified longitudinally using logistic regression models with random effects. Results In total, 1373 imaging tests were performed among 332 patients. Distant metastases were detected in 110 (33%) patients during a median follow-up of 61 months (interquartile range 38–86), and first detected by imaging in 86 (78%) patients. 152 (68%) patients had at least one false-positive result. Sensitivity of the schedule over 5 years was 79% [95% confidence interval (CI) 70–86%] and specificity was 88% (95% CI 86–90%). There was no evidence of a significant difference in test performance over follow-up time or by American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) substage. The positive predictive value ranged between 33 and 48% over follow-up time, reflecting a ratio of 1:2 false-positives per true-positive finding. Conclusions Regular 6- or 12-monthly surveillance imaging using CT or PET/CT has reasonable and consistent sensitivity and specificity over 5-year follow-up for resected stage IIIA–D melanoma patients. These data are useful when discussing the risks and benefits of long-term follow-up.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherAnnals of Surgical Oncologyen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0en
dc.subjectLong-term CT and PET/CT Surveillanceen
dc.subjectDetectionen
dc.subjectRecurrenceen
dc.subjectResected Stage IIIA-D Melanomaen
dc.titlePerformance of long-term CT and PET/CT surveillance for detection of distant recurrence in patients with resected stage IIIA-D melanomaen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1245/s10434-020-09270-3en
dc.type.pubtypeAuthor accepted manuscripten
usyd.facultyFaculty of Medicine and Healthen
usyd.departmentNHMRC Clinical Trials Centreen
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.