Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChan, Christopher T.
dc.contributor.authorBlankestijn, Peter J.
dc.contributor.authorDember, Laura M.
dc.contributor.authorGallieni, Maurizio
dc.contributor.authorHarris, David C.H
dc.contributor.authorLok, Charmaine E.
dc.contributor.authorMehrotra, Rajnish
dc.contributor.authorStevens, Paul E.
dc.contributor.authorWang, Angela Yee-Moon
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Michael
dc.contributor.authorWheeler, David C.
dc.contributor.authorWinkelmayer, Wolfgang C.
dc.contributor.authorPollock, Carol A.
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-15T06:36:34Z
dc.date.available2023-05-15T06:36:34Z
dc.date.issued2019en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/31233
dc.description.abstractGlobally, the number of patients undergoing maintenance dialysis is increasing, yet throughout the world there is significant variability in the practice of initiating dialysis. Factors such as availability of resources, reasons for starting dialysis, timing of dialysis initiation, patient education and preparedness, dialysis modality and access, as well as varied "country-specific" factors significantly affect patient experiences and outcomes. As the burden of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) has increased globally, there has also been a growing recognition of the importance of patient involvement in determining the goals of care and decisions regarding treatment. In January 2018, KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) convened a Controversies Conference focused on dialysis initiation, including modality choice, access, and prescription. Here we present a summary of the conference discussions, including identified knowledge gaps, areas of controversy, and priorities for research. A major novel theme represented during the conference was the need to move away from a "one-size-fits-all" approach to dialysis and provide more individualized care that incorporates patient goals and preferences while still maintaining best practices for quality and safety. Identifying and including patient-centered goals that can be validated as quality indicators in the context of diverse health care systems to achieve equity of outcomes will require alignment of goals and incentives between patients, providers, regulators, and payers that will vary across health care jurisdictions.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherKidney Internationalen_AU
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0en_AU
dc.subjectgoal-directed dialysisen_AU
dc.subjecthemodialysisen_AU
dc.subjecthome dialysisen_AU
dc.subjectinitiationen_AU
dc.subjectmodalityen_AU
dc.subjectperitoneal dialysisen_AU
dc.subjectprescriptionen_AU
dc.subjectsymptom controlen_AU
dc.subjectvascular and peritoneal dialysis access.en_AU
dc.titleDialysis initiation, modality choice, access, and prescription: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conferenceen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2019.01.017
dc.type.pubtypePublisher's versionen_AU
usyd.facultyFaculty of Medicine and Healthen_AU
usyd.departmentNHMRC Clinical Trials Centreen_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.