Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLivingstone, Ann
dc.contributor.authorDempsey, Kathy
dc.contributor.authorStockler, Martin R.
dc.contributor.authorHoward, Kirsten
dc.contributor.authorLong, Georgina V.
dc.contributor.authorCarlino, Matteo S.
dc.contributor.authorMenzies, Alexander M.
dc.contributor.authorMorton, Rachael L.
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-28T05:38:59Z
dc.date.available2023-03-28T05:38:59Z
dc.date.issued2021en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/31042
dc.description.abstractBackground Adjuvant immunotherapy is revolutionising care for patients with resected stage III and IV melanoma. However, immunotherapy may be associated with toxicity, making treatment decisions complicated. This study aimed to identify factors physicians and nurses considered regarding adjuvant immunotherapy for melanoma. Methods In-depth interviews were conducted with physicians (medical oncologists, surgeons and dermatologists) and nurses managing patients with resected stage III melanoma at three Australian tertiary melanoma centres between July 2019 and March 2020. Factors considered regarding adjuvant immunotherapy were explored. Recruitment continued until data saturation and thematic analysis was undertaken. Results Twenty-five physicians and nurses, aged 28–68 years, 60% females, including eleven (44%) medical oncologists, eight (32%) surgeons, five (20%) nurses, and one (4%) dermatologist were interviewed. Over half the sample managed five or more new resected stage III patients per month who could be eligible for adjuvant immunotherapy. Three themes about adjuvant immunotherapy recommendations emerged: [1] clinical and patient factors, [2] treatment information provision, and [3] individual physician/nurse factors. Melanoma sub-stage and an individual patient’s therapy risk/benefit profile were primary considerations. Secondary factors included uncertainty about adjuvant immunotherapy’s effectiveness and their views about treatment burden patients might consider acceptable. Conclusions Patients’ disease sub-stage and their treatment risk versus benefit drove the melanoma health care professionals’ adjuvant immunotherapy endorsement. Findings clarify clinician preferences and values, aiding clinical communication with patients and facilitating clinical decision-making about management options for resected stage III melanoma.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherBMC Canceren_AU
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0en_AU
dc.subjectMelanomaen_AU
dc.subjectImmunotherapyen_AU
dc.subjectInterviewsen_AU
dc.subjectPhysiciansen_AU
dc.subjectSurgeonsen_AU
dc.subjectNurse cliniciansen_AU
dc.subjectProfessional roleen_AU
dc.subjectDecision makingen_AU
dc.titleAdjuvant immunotherapy recommendations for stage III melanoma: physician and nurse interviewsen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08752-1
dc.type.pubtypePublisher's versionen_AU
usyd.facultyFaculty of Medicine and Healthen_AU
usyd.departmentNHMRC Clinical Trials Centreen_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.