Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDuncanson, Emily
dc.contributor.authorBennett, Paul N.
dc.contributor.authorViecelli, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorDansie, Kathryn
dc.contributor.authorHandke, William
dc.contributor.authorTong, Allison
dc.contributor.authorPalmer, Suetonia
dc.contributor.authorJesudason, Shilpanjali
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, Stephen P.
dc.contributor.authorMorton, Rachael L.
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-07T04:09:16Z
dc.date.available2023-03-07T04:09:16Z
dc.date.issued2020en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/30164
dc.description.abstractIntroduction People receiving haemodialysis experience a high symptom burden and impaired quality of life. The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is increasing in nephrology care, however their acceptability, utility and impacts are not well understood. Methods and analysis We describe a protocol for a qualitative study to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of electronic-PROMs (e-PROMs) data capture and feedback in haemodialysis following the pilot Symptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT). SWIFT involves linkage of e-PROMs data, including symptoms and health-related quality of life, to the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry with feedback to patients’ treating nephrologists and nurse unit managers. Focus groups and semistructured interviews will be conducted with nephrologists (n=15), dialysis nurses (n=24) and patients receiving haemodialysis (n=24) from six dialysis units in Australia. Question topics will include the technical and clinical feasibility and acceptability of e-PROMs reporting and feedback (including the barriers and enablers to uptake) and perceived impact on patient care and outcomes. Transcripts will be analysed thematically and guided by Normalisation Process Theory. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval was obtained from the relevant hospital Human Research Ethics Committees (HREC/18/CALHN/481; HREC/MML/54599). The findings from the SWIFT pilot and qualitative evaluation will inform the implementation of the SWIFT main trial, and more broadly, the use of e-PROMs in clinical settings and registries.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherBMJ Openen_AU
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0en_AU
dc.subjectFeasibility and acceptabilityen_AU
dc.subjectePROMs dataen_AU
dc.subjecthaemodialysisen_AU
dc.subjectSymptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT)en_AU
dc.titleFeasibility and acceptability of ePROMs data capture and feedback among patients receiving haemodialysis in the Symptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT) pilot: protocol for a qualitative study in Australiaen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039014
dc.type.pubtypePublisher's versionen_AU
usyd.facultyFaculty of Medicine and Healthen_AU
usyd.departmentNHMRC Clinical Trials Centreen_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.