Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMyran, Daniel T.
dc.contributor.authorMorton, Rachael
dc.contributor.authorBiggs, Beverley-Ann
dc.contributor.authorVeldhuijzen, Irene
dc.contributor.authorCastelli, Francesco
dc.contributor.authorTran, Anh
dc.contributor.authorStaub, Lukas P.
dc.contributor.authorAgbata, Eric
dc.contributor.authorRahman, Prinon
dc.contributor.authorPareek, Manish
dc.contributor.authorNoori, Teymur
dc.contributor.authorPottie, Kevin
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-16T03:21:19Z
dc.date.available2023-02-16T03:21:19Z
dc.date.issued2018en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/30060
dc.description.abstract: Migrants from hepatitis B virus (HBV) endemic countries to the European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA) comprise 5.1% of the total EU/EEA population but account for 25% of total chronic Hepatitis B (CHB) infection. Migrants from high HBV prevalence regions are at the highest risk for CHB morbidity. These migrants are at risk of late detection of CHB complications; mortality and onwards transmission. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of CHB screening and vaccination programs among migrants to the EU/EEA. We found no RCTs or direct evidence evaluating the effectiveness of CHB screening on morbidity and mortality of migrants. We therefore used a systematic evidence chain approach to identify studies relevant to screening and prevention programs; testing, treatment, and vaccination. We identified four systematic reviews and five additional studies and guidelines that reported on screening and vaccination effectiveness. Studies reported that vaccination programs were highly effective at reducing the prevalence of CHB in children (RR 0.07 95% CI 0.04 to 0.13) following vaccination. Two meta-analyses of therapy for chronic HBV infection found improvement in clinical outcomes and intermediate markers of disease. We identified nine studies examining the cost-effectiveness of screening for CHB: a strategy of screening and treating CHB compared to no screening. The median acceptance of HB screening was 87.4% (range 32.3–100%). Multiple studies highlighted barriers to and the absence of effective strategies to ensure linkage of treatment and care for migrants with CHB. In conclusion, screening of high-risk children and adults and vaccination of susceptible children, combined with treatment of CHB infection in migrants, are promising and cost-effective interventions,but linkage to treatment requires more attention.en_AU
dc.publisherInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Healthen_AU
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0en_AU
dc.subjectHBVen_AU
dc.subjectCHBen_AU
dc.subjectscreeningen_AU
dc.subjectvaccinationen_AU
dc.subjectrefugeesen_AU
dc.subjectmigrantsen_AU
dc.titleThe Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Screening for and Vaccination Against Hepatitis B Virus among Migrants in the EU/EEA: A Systematic Reviewen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ijerph15091898
dc.type.pubtypePublisher's versionen_AU
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::NHMRC Clinical Trials Centreen_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.