Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMorton, Rachael L.
dc.contributor.authorSchlackow, Iryna
dc.contributor.authorGray, Alastair
dc.contributor.authorEmberson, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorHerrington, William
dc.contributor.authorStaplin, Natalie
dc.contributor.authorReith, Christina
dc.contributor.authorHoward, Kirsten
dc.contributor.authorLandray, Martin J.
dc.contributor.authorCass, Alan
dc.contributor.authorBaigent, Colin
dc.contributor.authorMihaylova, Borislava
dc.contributor.authoron behalf of the, SHARP Collaborative Group
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-16T00:06:19Z
dc.date.available2023-02-16T00:06:19Z
dc.date.issued2017en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/30051
dc.description.abstractIntroduction The impact of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on income is unclear. We sought to determine whether CKD severity, serious adverse events, and CKD progression affected household income. Methods Analyses were undertaken in a prospective cohort of adults with moderate-to-severe CKD in the Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP), with household income information available at baseline screening and study end. Logistic regressions, adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics, smoking, and prior diseases at baseline, estimated associations during the 5-year follow-up, among (i) baseline CKD severity, (ii) incident nonfatal serious adverse events (vascular or cancer), and (iii) CKD treatment modality (predialysis, dialysis, or transplanted) at study end and the outcome “fall into relative poverty.” This was defined as household income <50% of country median income. Results A total of 2914 SHARP participants from 14 countries were included in the main analysis. Of these, 933 (32%) were in relative poverty at screening; of the remaining 1981, 436 (22%) fell into relative poverty by study end. Compared with participants with stage 3 CKD at baseline, the odds of falling into poverty were 51% higher for those with stage 4 (odds ratio [OR]: 1.51; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09–2.10), 66% higher for those with stage 5 (OR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.11–2.47), and 78% higher for those on dialysis at baseline (OR: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.22–2.60). Participants with kidney transplant at study end had approximately half the risk of those on dialysis or those with CKD stages 3 to 5. Conclusion More advanced CKD is associated with increased odds of falling into poverty. Kidney transplantation may have a role in reducing this risk.en_AU
dc.publisherElsevieren_AU
dc.relation.ispartofKidney International Reportsen_AU
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0en_AU
dc.subjectchronic renal insufficiencyen_AU
dc.subjectdialysisen_AU
dc.subjectincomeen_AU
dc.subjectpovertyen_AU
dc.subjecttransplantationen_AU
dc.titleImpact of CKD on Household Incomeen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ekir.2017.12.008
dc.type.pubtypePublisher's versionen_AU
dc.rights.other© 2017 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc.en_AU
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::NHMRC Clinical Trials Centreen_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.