Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDieng, Mbathio
dc.contributor.authorButow, Phyllis N.
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Daniel S.J.
dc.contributor.authorMorton, Rachael L.
dc.contributor.authorMenzies, Scott W.
dc.contributor.authorMireskandari, Shab
dc.contributor.authorTesson, Stephanie
dc.contributor.authorMann, Graham J.
dc.contributor.authorCust, Anne E.
dc.contributor.authorKasparian, Nadine A.
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-13T05:03:51Z
dc.date.available2023-02-13T05:03:51Z
dc.date.issued2016en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/30007
dc.description.abstractPurpose People with a history of melanoma commonly report a fear of cancer recurrence (FCR), yet psychologic support is not routinely offered as part of ongoing melanoma care. This randomized controlled trial examined the efficacy of a psychoeducational intervention to reduce FCR and improve psychologic adjustment in this patient group compared with usual care. Methods The intervention comprised a newly developed psychoeducational resource and three telephonebased psychotherapeutic sessions over a 1-month period timed in accordance with dermatologic appointments. Participants were randomly assigned to intervention (n = 80) or usual care (n = 84). Assessments were completed at baseline, 1 month, and 6 months after dermatologic appointments. Linear mixed models were used to examine differences between treatment and control groups for patient-reported outcomes, including FCR, anxiety, stress, depression, melanoma-related knowledge, health behaviors, satisfaction with melanoma care, unmet needs, and health-related quality of life. Results At 6 months, the intervention group reported lower FCR severity, trigger, and distress scores than the control group in the baseline-adjusted models; the between-group mean difference was 21.9 for FCR severity (95% CI, 23.1 to 20.7; P = .002), 22.0 for FCR triggers (95% CI, 23.3 to 20.7; P = .003), and 20.7 for FCR distress (95% CI, 21.3 to 20.1; P = .03). The decrease in FCR severity (but not triggers or distress) remained statistically significant after adjustment for other covariates (P = .04). At 6 months, the intervention group also reported lower stress (21.6; 95% CI, 23.1 to 20.2; P = .03) and improved melanoma-related knowledge (1.7; 95% CI, 0.8 to 2.6; P , .001) compared with the control group. No differences were found between groups for other secondary outcomes. Conclusion This newly developed evidence-based psychoeducational intervention was effective in reducing FCR and stress and with increasing melanoma-related knowledge in people at high risk for another melanoma.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherJournal Of Clinical Oncologyen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0en
dc.subjectPsychoeducational Interventionen
dc.subjectFear of Cancer Recurrenceen
dc.titlePsychoeducational Intervention to Reduce Fear of Cancer Recurrence in People at High Risk of Developing Another Primary Melanoma: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trialen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doiDOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.2278
dc.type.pubtypePublisher's versionen
usyd.facultyFaculty of Medicine and Healthen
usyd.departmentNHMRC Clinical Trials Centreen
workflow.metadata.onlyYesen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.