Automated Analysis of Chest Radiographs for Cystic Fibrosis Scoring
Access status:
Open Access
Type
Conference paperAuthor/s
Huang, ZhaoweiDing, Chen
Zhang, Lei
Lee, Min-Zhao
Song, Yang
Selvadural, Hiran
Feng, Dagan
Zhang, Yanning
Cai, Weidong
Abstract
We present a framework to analyze chest radiographs for cystic fibro-sis using machine learning methods. We compare the representational power of deep learning features with traditional texture features. Specifically, we respec-tively employ VGG-16 based deep learning features, ...
See moreWe present a framework to analyze chest radiographs for cystic fibro-sis using machine learning methods. We compare the representational power of deep learning features with traditional texture features. Specifically, we respec-tively employ VGG-16 based deep learning features, Tamura and Gabor filter based textural features to represent the cystic fibrosis images. We demonstrate that VGG-16 features perform best, with a maximum agreement of 82%. In ad-dition, due to limited dimensionality, Tamura features for unsegmented images achieve no more than 50% agreement; however, after segmentation, the accuracy of Tamura can reach 78%. In combination with using the deep learning features, we also compare back propagation neural network and sparse coding classifiers to the typical SVM classifier with polynomial kernel function. The result shows that neural network and sparse coding classifiers outperform SVM in most cases. Only with insufficient training samples does SVM demonstrate higher accuracy.
See less
See moreWe present a framework to analyze chest radiographs for cystic fibro-sis using machine learning methods. We compare the representational power of deep learning features with traditional texture features. Specifically, we respec-tively employ VGG-16 based deep learning features, Tamura and Gabor filter based textural features to represent the cystic fibrosis images. We demonstrate that VGG-16 features perform best, with a maximum agreement of 82%. In ad-dition, due to limited dimensionality, Tamura features for unsegmented images achieve no more than 50% agreement; however, after segmentation, the accuracy of Tamura can reach 78%. In combination with using the deep learning features, we also compare back propagation neural network and sparse coding classifiers to the typical SVM classifier with polynomial kernel function. The result shows that neural network and sparse coding classifiers outperform SVM in most cases. Only with insufficient training samples does SVM demonstrate higher accuracy.
See less
Date
2018Source title
Proceedings of International Conference on Brain Inspired Cognitive Systems (BICS 2018)Publisher
SpringerFunding information
ARC DP170104304Faculty/School
Faculty of EngineeringDepartment, Discipline or Centre
School of Computer ScienceShare