Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCrail, S
dc.contributor.authorWalker, R
dc.contributor.authorBrown, MA
dc.contributor.authorBerquier, I
dc.contributor.authorBrennan, F
dc.contributor.authorCherian, S
dc.contributor.authorFassett, R
dc.contributor.authorFoote, C
dc.contributor.authorGlavish, R
dc.contributor.authorHealy, H
dc.contributor.authorJosland, E
dc.contributor.authorKatz, I
dc.contributor.authorLangham, R
dc.contributor.authorMay, S
dc.contributor.authorMasterson, R
dc.contributor.authorMathew, T
dc.contributor.authorMiller, C
dc.contributor.authorMorton, R
dc.contributor.authorPhipps, L
dc.contributor.authorRobins, J
dc.contributor.authorSajiv, C
dc.contributor.authorSiva, B
dc.contributor.authorStallworthy, E
dc.contributor.authorStewart, C
dc.contributor.authorUrban, K
dc.contributor.authorWalker, R
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-22T23:36:36Z
dc.date.available2022-08-22T23:36:36Z
dc.date.issued2013en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/29437
dc.description.abstractSince the introduction of haemodialysis in the management of acute kidney injury in the 1940s and for chronic kidney disease (CKD) in the 1960s dialysis has become one of the most successful advances in medical technology, with almost 11 000 patients currently receiving dialysis in Australia and almost 2500 in New Zealand. Like all medical technologies, its place continues to evolve. For a time, dialysis was seen as a treatment best delivered only to younger patients without diabetes; today the greatest uptake of dialysis is in patients over age 65 and the most common cause of needing dialysis is diabetes. Along with these extended criteria for dialysis, that have evolved over many years, has come the recognition that the older dialysis patient often has considerable co-morbidity and frailty, that time spent on dialysis is not always beneficial to these patients and that their overall prognosis is considerably worse than their younger counterparts. CARI guidelines recommend that ‘an expectation of survival with an acceptable quality of life’ is a useful starting point for recommending dialysis.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherNephrology 18en_AU
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden_AU
dc.subjectrenal careen_AU
dc.subjectpalliative careen_AU
dc.subjectdialysisen_AU
dc.subjectchronic kidney diseaseen_AU
dc.titleRenal supportive and palliative care: position statement.en_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.subject.asrc1117 Public Health and Health Servicesen_AU
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/nep.12064
dc.type.pubtypeAuthor accepted manuscripten_AU
usyd.facultyFaculty of Medicine and Healthen_AU
usyd.departmentNHMRC Clinical Trials Centreen_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.