Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCromer, Deborahen_AU
dc.contributor.authorSteain, Meganen_AU
dc.contributor.authorReynaldi, Arnolden_AU
dc.contributor.authorSchlub, Timothy Een_AU
dc.contributor.authorWheatley, Adam Ken_AU
dc.contributor.authorJuno, Jennifer Aen_AU
dc.contributor.authorKent, Stephen Jen_AU
dc.contributor.authorTriccas, James Aen_AU
dc.contributor.authorKhoury, David Sen_AU
dc.contributor.authorDavenport, Miles Pen_AU
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T05:05:10Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T05:05:10Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/27042
dc.description.abstractBackground Several SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern have been identified that partly escape serum neutralisation elicited by current vaccines. Studies have also shown that vaccines demonstrate reduced protection against symptomatic infection with SARS-CoV-2 variants. We explored whether in-vitro neutralisation titres remain predictive of vaccine protection from infection with SARS-CoV-2 variants. Methods In this meta-analysis, we analysed published data from 24 identified studies on in-vitro neutralisation and clinical protection to understand the loss of neutralisation to existing SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern. We integrated the results of this analysis into our existing statistical model relating in-vitro neutralisation to protection (parameterised on data from ancestral virus infection) to estimate vaccine efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 variants. We also analysed data on boosting of vaccine responses and use the model to predict the impact of booster vaccination on protection against SARS-CoV-2 variants. Findings The neutralising activity against the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 was highly predictive of neutralisation of variants of concern. Decreases in neutralisation titre to the alpha (1·6-fold), beta (8·8-fold), gamma (3·5-fold), and delta (3·9-fold) variants (compared to the ancestral virus) were not significantly different between different vaccines. Neutralisation remained strongly correlated with protection from symptomatic infection with SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (r S=0·81, p=0·0005) and the existing model remained predictive of vaccine efficacy against variants of concern once decreases in neutralisation to the variants of concern were incorporated. Modelling of predicted vaccine efficacy against variants over time suggested that protection against symptomatic infection might decrease below 50% within the first year after vaccination for some vaccines. Boosting of previously infected individuals with existing vaccines (which target ancestral virus) is predicted to provide a higher degree of protection from infection with variants of concern than primary vaccination schedules alone. Interpretation In-vitro neutralisation titres remain a correlate of protection from SARS-CoV-2 variants and modelling of the effects of waning immunity predicts a loss of protection to the variants after vaccination. However, booster vaccination with current vaccines should enable higher neutralisation to SARS-CoV-2 variants than is achieved with primary vaccination, which is predicted to provide robust protection from severe infection outcomes with the current SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, at least in the medium term. Funding The National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia), the Medical Research Future Fund (Australia), and the Victorian Government.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_AUI
dc.subjectCoronavirusen_AUI
dc.titleNeutralising antibody titres as predictors of protection against SARS-CoV-2 variants and the impact of boosting: a meta-analysisen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/s2666-5247(21)00267-6
dc.relation.otherGovernment of Victoriaen_AU
dc.relation.otherNational Health and Medical Research Councilen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.