Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPhi, Xuan-Anh
dc.contributor.authorTagliafico, Alberto S
dc.contributor.authorHoussami, Nehmat
dc.contributor.authorGreuter, Marcel J. W.
dc.contributor.authorde Bock, Geertruida H.
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-15T03:41:02Z
dc.date.available2021-09-15T03:41:02Z
dc.date.issued2018en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/25999
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to systematically review and to meta-analyse the accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) versus digital mammography (DM) in women with mammographically dense breasts in screening and diagnosis. Two independent reviewers identified screening or diagnostic studies reporting at least one of four outcomes (cancer detection rate-CDR, recall rate, sensitivity and specificity) for DBT and DM in women with mammographically dense breasts. Study quality was assessed using QUADAS-2. Meta-analysis of CDR and recall rate used a random effects model. Summary ROC curve summarized sensitivity and specificity.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen
dc.relation.ispartofBMC canceren
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0en
dc.subjectBreast neoplasmen
dc.subjectDigital mammographyen
dc.subjectDigital breast tomosynthesisen
dc.subjectReviewen
dc.subjectMeta-analysisen
dc.subjectBreast densityen
dc.titleDigital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening and diagnosis in women with dense breasts – a systematic review and meta-analysis.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.subject.asrc1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesisen
dc.subject.asrc1117 Public Health and Health Servicesen
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12885-018-4263-3
dc.relation.arcNational Breast Cancer Foundation (NBCF)
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::Sydney School of Public Healthen
usyd.citation.volume18en
usyd.citation.issue380en
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.