Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMacneill, Paul
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-01T01:21:44Z
dc.date.available2021-07-01T01:21:44Z
dc.date.issued2020en_AU
dc.identifier.issn1176-7529 1872-4353
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/25553
dc.description.abstractThis is a commentary criticising the philosophical assumptions and the hermeneutical argument in a journal article in which the author attempts to deduce the subjective experience of a man with dementia.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherSpringeren_AU
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Bioethical Inquiryen_AU
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden_AU
dc.subjectHumanitiesen_AU
dc.subjectArten_AU
dc.subjectMedicine in Arten_AU
dc.subjectEthicsen_AU
dc.subjectBioethicsen_AU
dc.subjectDementiaen_AU
dc.titleA Response to “Fragile Objects”en_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.subject.asrc18 Law and Legal Studiesen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11673-019-09955-9
dc.rights.otherThis is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in [insert journal title]. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-019-09955-9en_AU
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::Sydney School of Public Healthen_AU
usyd.departmentSydney Health Ethicsen_AU
usyd.citation.volume17en_AU
usyd.citation.spage21en_AU
usyd.citation.epage23en_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.