A Response to “Fragile Objects”

Access status:

Open Access

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Macneill, Paul
dc.date.accessioned	2021-07-01T01:21:44Z
dc.date.available	2021-07-01T01:21:44Z
dc.date.issued	2020	en
dc.identifier.issn	1176-7529
dc.identifier.issn	1872-4353
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/2123/25553
dc.description.abstract	This is a commentary criticising the philosophical assumptions and the hermeneutical argument in a journal article in which the author attempts to deduce the subjective experience of a man with dementia.	en
dc.language.iso	en	en
dc.publisher	Springer	en
dc.relation.ispartof	Journal of Bioethical Inquiry	en
dc.rights	Copyright All Rights Reserved	en
dc.subject	Humanities	en
dc.subject	Art	en
dc.subject	Medicine in Art	en
dc.subject	Ethics	en
dc.subject	Bioethics	en
dc.subject	Dementia	en
dc.title	A Response to “Fragile Objects”	en
dc.type	Article	en
dc.subject.asrc	18 Law and Legal Studies	en
dc.identifier.doi	10.1007/s11673-019-09955-9
dc.rights.other	This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in [insert journal title]. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-019-09955-9	en
usyd.faculty	SeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::Sydney School of Public Health	en
usyd.department	Sydney Health Ethics	en
usyd.citation.volume	17	en
usyd.citation.spage	21	en
usyd.citation.epage	23	en
workflow.metadata.only	No	en