Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStuart, Robyn Men_AU
dc.contributor.authorAbeysuriya, Romesh Gen_AU
dc.contributor.authorKerr, Cliff Cen_AU
dc.contributor.authorMistry, Dinaen_AU
dc.contributor.authorKlein, Dan Jen_AU
dc.contributor.authorGray, Richard Ten_AU
dc.contributor.authorHellard, Margareten_AU
dc.contributor.authorScott, Nicken_AU
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-02T04:54:46Z
dc.date.available2021-06-02T04:54:46Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/25147
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: The early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic illustrated that SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes the disease, has the potential to spread exponentially. Therefore, as long as a substantial proportion of the population remains susceptible to infection, the potential for new epidemic waves persists even in settings with low numbers of active COVID-19 infections, unless sufficient countermeasures are in place. We aim to quantify vulnerability to resurgences in COVID-19 transmission under variations in the levels of testing, tracing and mask usage. SETTING: The Australian state of New South Wales (NSW), a setting with prolonged low transmission, high mobility, non-universal mask usage and a well-functioning test-and-trace system. PARTICIPANTS: None (simulation study). RESULTS: We find that the relative impact of masks is greatest when testing and tracing rates are lower and vice versa. Scenarios with very high testing rates (90% of people with symptoms, plus 90% of people with a known history of contact with a confirmed case) were estimated to lead to a robustly controlled epidemic. However, across comparable levels of mask uptake and contact tracing, the number of infections over this period was projected to be 2-3 times higher if the testing rate was 80% instead of 90%, 8-12 times higher if the testing rate was 65% or 30-50 times higher with a 50% testing rate. In reality, NSW diagnosed 254 locally acquired cases over this period, an outcome that had a moderate probability in the model (10%-18%) assuming low mask uptake (0%-25%), even in the presence of extremely high testing (90%) and near-perfect community contact tracing (75%-100%), and a considerably higher probability if testing or tracing were at lower levels. CONCLUSIONS: Our work suggests that testing, tracing and masks can all be effective means of controlling transmission. A multifaceted strategy that combines all three, alongside continued hygiene and distancing protocols, is likely to be the most robust means of controlling transmission of SARS-CoV-2.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_AU
dc.subjectCoronavirusen_AU
dc.titleRole of masks, testing and contact tracing in preventing COVID-19 resurgences: a case study from New South Wales, Australiaen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045941


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.