Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorQuist-Nelson, Johanna
dc.contributor.authorSeidler, Anna Lene
dc.contributor.authorde Ruigh, Annemijn A
dc.contributor.authorvan der Ham, David P
dc.contributor.authorWillekes, Christine
dc.contributor.authorBerghella, Vincenzo
dc.contributor.authorPajkrt, Eva
dc.contributor.authorPatterson, Jillian
dc.contributor.authorEspinoza, David
dc.contributor.authorMorris, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorMol, Ben
dc.contributor.authorAskie, Lisa
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-25T01:32:25Z
dc.date.available2021-03-25T01:32:25Z
dc.date.issued2018en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/24731
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of immediate delivery an expectant management among women whose pregnancies were complicated by preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) in the late preterm period (from 34 0/7 weeks until 36 6/7 weeks of gestation). DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception until December 2016. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: We included all randomized controlled trials with individual participant data reporting on late preterm PROM with randomization to immediate delivery or expectant management. The primary outcome was a composite of adverse neonatal outcomes: probable or definitive neonatal sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, respiratory distress syndrome, stillbirth, or neonatal death. TABULATION, INTEGRATION AND RESULTS: Of eight eligible trials (total n=3,203 mothers), three (2,563 mothers, 2,572 neonates) had individual participant data available. The composite adverse neonatal outcome occurred in 9.6% of neonates in the immediate delivery group and 8.3% in the expectant management group (relative risk [RR] 1.20, 95% CI 0.94–1.55). Neonatal sepsis rates were 2.6% and 3.5%, respectively (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.47–1.15). Neonates in the immediate delivery group were more likely to be diagnosed with respiratory distress syndrome (RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.10–1.97), and to be admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit or special care nursery (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.11–1.23) and had longer admissions. Mothers randomized to immediate delivery were less likely to have an antepartum hemorrhage (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.34–0.95) or chorioamnionitis (RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.13–0.35), but more likely to undergo cesarean delivery (RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.08–1.47). CONCLUSION: In women with late preterm PROM, immediate delivery and expectant management resulted in comparable rates of the composite of adverse neonatal outcomes. Effects on individual secondary maternal and neonatal outcomes were mixed.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer Healthen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofObstetrics & Gynecologyen_AU
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden_AU
dc.titleImmediate Delivery Compared With Expectant Management in Late Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: An Individual Participant Data Meta-analysisen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.subject.asrc11 Medical and Health Sciencesen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/AOG.0000000000002447
dc.rights.otherThis is a non-final version of an article published in final form in [Quist-Nelson, J., de Ruigh, A.A., Seidler, A.L. et al. (2018). Immediate Delivery Coen_AU
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::NHMRC Clinical Trials Centreen_AU
usyd.citation.volume131en_AU
usyd.citation.issue2en_AU
usyd.citation.spage269en_AU
usyd.citation.epage279en_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.