Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSeidler, Anna Lene
dc.contributor.authorRethberg, Constanze
dc.contributor.authorSchmitt, Jochen
dc.contributor.authorNienhaus, albert
dc.contributor.authorSeidler, Andreas
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-24T04:34:26Z
dc.date.available2021-03-24T04:34:26Z
dc.date.issued2017en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/24725
dc.description.abstractBackground: Chronic low back pain (LBP) is a common health problem, with a large potential for primary prevention. Health utilities (HU) reflect which proportion of their expected remaining life time individuals would hypothetically trade to be alleviated of a health condition of interest. A value of 0 means "prefer to die immediately", a value of 1 means "not willing to trade any life time". The aim of this cross-sectional study was to assess HU for LBP patients and for healthy participants and to examine whether HU for LBP are useful indicators to substantiate preventive and therapeutic decision making. Methods: Healthy participants (n = 126) and LBP patients (n = 32) were recruited mainly among the employees of a tertiary care hospital in Germany. Standardized LBP scenarios were presented to all participants and HU values were assessed using the time-trade-off method. Results: Median HU for LBP were 0.90 (IQR 0.31) for participants and 0.93 (IQR 0.10) for LBP patients. Measurements were consistent across illness severity ratings with HU and with a visual analogue scale (VAS); in the healthy sample the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.61 (95% CI 0.23-1.00, F(1125) = 190, p < .001), in the patient sample the ICC was 0.66 (95% CI = 0.24-1.00, F(1,31) = 62, p < .001). 8% of participants reported HU of 1. There was no statistically significant relation between HU and age, income, or gender. Conclusion: On average, participants chose a 7 to 10% shorter life expectancy to avoid LBP, but almost 1 in 10 participants were not willing to trade any life years. The results indicate a certain stability of HU due to the comparability of HU ratings across patients and healthy participants, the measurement consistency when comparing VAS and HU ratings, and the lack of association between demographic variables and HU. This underlines the usefulness of HU for measuring illness severity in comparative health economics evaluations of preventive and therapeutic measures that address chronic LBP or other pain-characterized diseases. Future studies should focus on different LBP intensities and derive stratified HU that reflect the distribution of pain intensity in the population.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherJournal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicologyen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicologyen_AU
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden_AU
dc.titleHealth utilities for chronic low back painen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.subject.asrc11 Medical and Health Sciencesen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12995-017-0172-7
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::NHMRC Clinical Trials Centreen_AU
usyd.citation.volume12en_AU
usyd.citation.issue28en_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.